English

Improving Health, Economic, and Social Outcomes Through Integrated Housing Intervention

The Green & Healthy Homes (GHHI) Healthy Homes Demonstration Project utilized the standards and practices created by GHHI: A Holistic Housing Assessment coupled with environmental health education and combined as an integrated environmental health and energy housing intervention for children with asthma, ages 2–14.

ABSTRACT:

Poor quality housing is an ongoing environmental injustice placing a significant burden on low-income and minority families. The Green & Healthy Homes Initiative (GHHI) in Baltimore, MD, grew out of the historical healthy homes work of the Coalition to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, an organization dedicated to using housing as a platform for health to ensure environmental and socialjustice for families and children in low-income communities. GHHI’s Healthy Homes Demonstration Project utilized the standards and practices created by GHHI: A Holistic Housing Assessment coupled with environmental health education and combined as an integrated environmental health and energy housing intervention for children with asthma, ages 2–14. The project braids resources from healthy homes, lead hazard reduction, weatherization, and energy efficiency projects to form a single multi-component, multi-factorial intervention. Findings from the health surveys at intake and six months after the intervention provide evidence of the impact on the reduction of asthma symptomatic episodes, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations, while showingimprovementsin school attendance and parents’ work attendance. Findings will provide evidence that improved health outcomes and more stable and productive homes in primarily African American, low-income neighborhoods are related to the mitigation of asthma triggers and home-based environmental health hazards. Upstream integrated housing interventions are an effective means to improve health, economic, and social outcomes for children diagnosed with asthma.

Contact Name: 
Leslie Anderson
Contact Email: 
landerson@ghhi.org
Contact Phone: 
2027695764
Language: 
Literacy Level: 

CHW Training and Certification Standards by State: ASTHO

As of January 1, 2014, a new Medicaid rule allows reimbursement for preventive services delivered by non-licensed providers, upon recommendation from a licensed Medicaid provider. ASTHO's website contains resources related to the new Medicaid rule, including examples of successful strategies for preventive service delivery by non-licensed providers such as Community Health Workers (CHWs), and other resources related to the adaptation, licensure, and support of CHWs.

State CHW Programs

Legislative Tracking

ASTHO's State Health Policy team tracks and analyzes legislation across the states to identify trends and emerging issues impacting public health and state health agencies. Real-time state legislative tracking on Community Health Workers is available on this web page under "Licensure and Certification".

Click here for a map of the current status of state CHW certification standards, a chart illustrating what states have which program requirements/elements in their CHW law, and chart outlining the summaries of each state’s CHW certification bill as of December 2014.

Contact Name: 
ASTHO
Contact Phone: 
202-371-9090
Language: 
Literacy Level: 

Free Care Rule Regulatory Change: New Opportunities for Medicaid Reimbursement in Schools

Since 1997, the “free care” rule has stated that Medicaid will not pay for services that are offered to the general public free of charge. The rule has stood as a significant barrier for schools to receive Medicaid reimbursement for health services provided to students enrolled in Medicaid. On December 15, 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a letter to State Medicaid Directors informing them of a decision to withdraw prior regulatory guidance on the free care rule. The following Q&A explains how this important reversal of Medicaid policy will impact coverage of school-based interventions for low-income children with asthma.

Why are school health services so important for low-income children with asthma? Many children come to school needing access to preventive health services, support for emotional development, care for acute illnesses, and help with managing chronic conditions. Almost half of public school children live in families at or below the federal poverty level, and many live in medically underserved communities with limited access to health care. For these children, schools become an important venue for receiving necessary health care services.  School health services are especially important for the more than 7 million US children with asthma who depend on access to school nurses and other health providers for appropriate management of their condition while at school.  As Medicaid-eligible populations are more likely to have asthma and less likely to have their condition well-controlled, offering asthma programs in low-income school districts is important for insuring that underserved children with asthma have access to the care they need.

How did the free care rule limit access to school health services for children with asthma?  Suppose a school had a large population of students with uncontrolled asthma and wanted to implement a comprehensive asthma management program for their students following National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines. If the school implemented such a program – including elements such as maintaining an asthma action plan for students and providing asthma education to help with self-management skills – the school would not be able to seek any Medicaid reimbursement for asthma management services rendered to Medicaid beneficiaries if the same services were provided to other students for free.  Application of the free care rule prevented Medicaid funds from flowing to schools even though medically necessary services (medical assistance to students experiencing asthma symptoms) and health education and anticipatory guidance (asthma self-management education) are covered generally by Medicaid and reimbursable under other circumstances. Without the opportunity to seek Medicaid funding, many schools in disadvantaged areas have been unable to deliver or maintain asthma management services for their students.

How does the rule change improve opportunities for school health services?  The recent withdrawal of the free care rule by CMS removes a major barrier to accessing funding for school health services. This shift in Medicaid policy has the potential to greatly change the health service landscape in schools that serve predominantly low-income, Medicaid-eligible students.  Upon implementation of this rule change, schools will have access to a dependable, sustainable source of reimbursement for the Medicaid-eligible services they provide or may want to provide.  The accessibility of Medicaid dollars opens doors to schools to address student health needs – high rates of asthma, diabetes, behavioral health issues, etc. – by implementing evidence-based programs school-wide.

What are next steps in implementation and what challenges exist?  CMS has now cleared the way for Medicaid reimbursement for school health services, but it is up to states and school districts to implement this rule change. Many states have integrated the free care rule into state regulations and these will need to be updated to enable schools to start seeking reimbursement from the state Medicaid plan. Resolving outdated state regulations is just the first step: the education sector needs to be informed about the rule change to help school districts overcome assumptions that they cannot bill Medicaid. Furthermore, schools will need to acquire the staff and technology infrastructure necessary to bill Medicaid for health services rendered.  These factors will take time and resources.  

File Attachment: 
Contact Name: 
EPA Asthma Team
Language: 
Target Audience: 

Pages